Comparitive/Contrast Assessment on Fast Food Nation and the Jungle

* proportional/Contrast Assessment* spendthrift aliment demesne **and The jungle Similar to the umteen in truth- sustenance stories told by Schlosser in his write scene of the spendthrift nutrition diligence, The jungleby Upton Sinclair is a leading light relation of the same type of horrors. foreign Schlosser, though, Sinclair writes his allow in a fictive stratum task, in which he include con lookrable models of analogical language and resource that strategic all(prenominal)y capture the reader in a world full of kindliness and belief. In this elbow room, he roles the journey of Jurgis Rudkis to hand over the conditions in the meat packing manufacturing in the United States.Jurgis, be the primary(prenominal) character, was not used only to hear the harsh and hidden lives of those working and lifetime in Packingt confess, how incessantly. Sinclair excessively used Jurgis to demonstrate his personal belief of capitalist economy cosmos corrosive. The interest ingeminate has been taken from a review found at AssociatedContent. com. The Jungle video displays the effects of economic hardship on an immigrant family in the early 1900s. That is all it is faithfully accountable for. This story is a downright attack on capitalism that the seed tries to conceal screwing a fictional story of a sympathy deriving family of Lithuanian Immigrants (A Review of The Jungle, 2007).Sinclairs attacks on the United States economic and governmental transcription immediately point out the antecedent side of his personality, and from at that place the doubt that his ideas and story are not radical in and of themselves as well begins to grow. It is with this part of his composing that Sinclair loses his rhetoric flair and ability to provoke quality expose journalism. In hallow for me to be able to in effect pardon how both extravagant Food kingdom and The Jungleare poor examples of divulge journalism, I must(prenominal) first enligh ten you with the definition of the developed term break.According to Websters impudent-sp run forg(prenominal) World College Dictionary 2009, muckraking is clear-cut for and publicizing, as in newspapers, either real or alleged corruption by public officials, business executives, or some otherwise important persons (Muckraking Definition, YourDictionary. com). Muckraking journalism is therefore defined as the literature that displays these corruptions of society, whether effectively or not. The role of journalism in a democratic society is to extend the truth, with minimal harm, and no outside interest. It should alike be held accountable to its readers. Journalists are not filling this role by reportage half-truths that send people into a anic, wish Fast Food Nation and however The Jungle. Starting with Fast Food Nation, I found by researching that many a(prenominal) another(prenominal) promulgated hold in reviews had at least unrivaled major commonality the book c overs alike many divers(prenominal) aspects of the turbulent viands indus turn up that it came to a point where there were too many things to comprehend and go incompetent all at once season reading. Thats not even e precisething he talked virtually either Throw in a p permithora of statistics and facts, and you have any(prenominal) highschoolly confused readers In his work, Schlosser writes, This is a book about fast pabulum, the value it embodies, and the world it has made. However, it is much much than that. It is everything that anybody could ever imagine that somehow, in some fabulously slight mood, has to do with fast food. Eric Schlosser tries to colleague everything from armed robbery to semipolitical bombings to the broadcast of a particular strain of Escherichia Coli, all with fast food companies. Schlosser discusses how and why the industry developed, current labor practices in fast food establishments, how the taste of food fuel now be manipulated, fede ral regulations (and wishing thereof), television and school advertising, health issues, and the dispel of fast food abroad. This book is sprucely disguised as universe about fast food. It is not about fast food. It is about how evil conservatives are and how capitalism is the cause of all that is bad in America. It is about how armed robbery has drastically increased. Fast food that happens to be mentioned quite a bit. The author eer inserts little comments here and there that try to make even very caputable topics out to be unequivocally bad things. In my opinion, this book should come with a warning label and include a free copy of The Communist manifesto (Jayson D. sportsmanlike, Socialist Propaganda in Fast Food). Jayson D. Whites perspective here describes what many others were dictum as well, telling of how Schlosser disgorges far-off and wide, devoting chapters to various aspects of the industry and then referencing other random aspects in unrelated chapters. The y do not all fit neatly together, and even the jumbled picture is a frightening one. Schlosser closes Fast Food Nationby secernateing that you lot still have it your way and that consumers have the choice to just say no to fast food.His hope is plain that, armed with the in buildation he provides, consumers willing make the obvious choice and run as fast as they brush off from any and every fast food joint. Unfortunately, he never really addresses the question of why consumers would (and so often do) favour to purchase the products of these establishments in the first place. He never mentions the opposing argument to his own personal viewpoint, and his credibility drops with that lack of information. Instead, Schlosser inputs more(prenominal) and more seemingly random statistics to show his own views have support behind them, when in all reality, they dont at all.Schlosser was determined to make a point, and he does so with the uncontrollable inhale to exaggerate details, add in suppositious facts and numbers, and altogether disregard the opposing viewpoint, something which is of high importance in a persuasive and informative rear of muckraking literature. This shows how Schlossers Fast Food Nation is a poor example to use when describing muckraking journalism. Now we can move on to The Jungle and the different viewpoints that have been written regarding the books contents and set-up.From the muckraking standpoint, the way Sinclair writes his fictional story is really quite interesting and as a result a lot more persuasive and believable than Schlossers book which is only jam packed with statistics. The following quote is one that I sense of nip really stands out strong from the book in regards to how imaginative and mind-painted creation Sinclairs writing is as a whole. . The Jungle, on the other hand, is written directly form Sinclairs personal experience of being in Packingtown for even just a week, and he already was able to smell the horrify ing scent, even taste the horrible scentSinclairs use of figurative language really appeals to the reader, and that strengthens the readers opinion to side with the author. Elzbieta sees how the sausage is doctored when she whole kit and boodle filling casings in the sausage room. She sees how any random mix of animal part is ground into sausage. Anything that is spoiled is simply colored with chemicals like borax and packaged for sale. In addition, she watches as leftovers that have fallen on the ball over of the room are scooped up, along with groundless rats and other filth, and put into the grinding mechanism for sausage (_The Jungle_ Upton Sinclair, Chapter 7).Not only does this quote give the reader a very nice detailed image to let them think over in the rear of their minds, it also gets its point across, which is that the meatpacking plants use absolutely anything in their batches of sausages that end up being sold at the tiptop market. As a result, this is a great m uckraking example included in the book. Upon reading The Jungle and various tiny analyses, I would say that the apologue is in reality quite nice in its general appeal to me as a reader.With this novel, being of journalistic muckraking character, I was amazingly persuaded for the most part with what Upton Sinclair was telling me. . In addition, unlike Fast Food Nation, I snarl like the pieces of information and statistics in The Junglewere relevant to the current topic at hand in the novel, rather than just being thrown at the reader in hopes of persuading them that this statistic pertains to the aspect being discussed. wish many of these reviews, I too flavor that The Jungle is not perfect however, I do agree with many critics that the manner in which the story was written was quite appealing.I was particularly attracted to and persuaded with the story line and its continuous rising and falling actions that were change with suspense, to the point where I actually treasured to read each and every close page so that I could call back out what would happenAs a reader, I mat up highly pressured to rely what was being told to me opus I read Eric Schlossers piece of literature, and that if I dont believe his words then I would be assisting in and attributing towards the awful-sounding statistics that were abundant in Fast Food Nation.While reading Sinclairs novel, on the other hand, I felt relatively at ease in making my own decision, knowing that there were facts and stories laying out there for me to drudge and believe if I so chose. As a result, I was more say to believe Sinclairs words than the legion(predicate) statistics and facts trying to be shoved down my throat by Schlosser. Another aspect of The Jungle that helped capture my overall opinion, and presumably many other readers as well, was that of the emotional appendix with the portrayed characters and the events they were going through.Sinclair did an excellent handicraft at creating a real life experience for the reader, as if they were the Jurgis in the book, creating explicit emotional reactions to the horrible reality of the meatpacking industry, which in turn establishes his pathos. However, like Schlosser, Sinclairs downfall was his inclusion of personal political and economic system goals.Upton Sinclairs sudden stray from the story and straightforward praise of collectivism at the end of the novel reveals his minute opinion of the economy of the United States and labels him as a radical believer in socialism, just like that of Schlosser in Fast Food Nation. Sinclairs book also hinders the readers knowledge of socialism because it does not reveal its proscribe effects. socialism puts complete control of the economy in the hands of the government.It places a barrier on production and decreases the influence to create new products. Socialism is a less grueling definition for an economy that supports communism. While Upton Sinclair wrote this novel to f ind righteousness and benefit the American people he fails to foresee the negative effects of his ideas. Sinclairs novel makes it evident that many immigrants and workingmen unjustifiably suffered under capitalism, but an economy influenced by his views would not necessarily be better. (Associated Content, 2007).By hiding the other sides opposition, just like what Schlosser did in Fast Food Nation, author Upton Sinclair hushes his audiences questions by not answering them whatsoever. As you can see, although each author wrote with a different style, the authors were still not nearly as effective muckraking journalism examples as they would have been. Bibliography Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser The Jungle by Upton Sinclair http//www. yourdictionary. com/muckraking http//www. amazon. com/Fast-Food-Nation-Eric-Schlosser/product-reviews/0395977894/ref=cm_cr_pr_hist_1? e=UTF8&showViewpoints=0&filterBy=addOneStar http//www. complete-review. com/reviews/food/schlosse. htm http//www. amazon. com/Fast-Food-Nation-Eric-Schlosser/product-reviews/0395977894/ref=cm_cr_pr_link_next_5? ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=0&filterBy=addOneStar&pageNumber=5 http//www. bookrags. com/notes/jun/TOP1. htm http//www. enotes. com/history/q-and-a/how-did-muckraking-journalism-change-u-s-44633 http//mandatorychaos. blogspot. com/2007/11/role-of-journalism-in-democracy. html